NA Not available.
1 Includes other drugs not shown separately.
2 1993-1997, represents Manhattan; beginning 1998, New York, NY.

Source: U.S. National Institute of Justice,1993-1996, Drug Use Forecasting, annual;ADAM 1997 Annual Report on Adult and Juvenile Arrestees, July 1998,1998 Annual Report on Adult and Juvenile Arrestees, April 1999.

http://www.ncjrs.org/drgsuse.htm

*Methodology

The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, formerly the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program, collects data atselected arrest booking facilities throughout the United States. Each quarter, trained local ADAM staff obtain voluntary andanonymous urine specimens and interviews from new samples of booked arrestees. The ADAM sample is based onarrestees brought into the booking facility and detained in the facilities less than 48 hours. Arrestees released before bookingare not part of the ADAM sample. At each site, approximately 225 males are sampled each quarter. In all except two sites,approximately 100 adult females also are sampled. At 12 sites, juvenile arrestees/detainees also are sampled. Generally,more than 90% of the arrestees selected for the sample agree to be interviewed and over 80% of those interviewed provideurine specimens.

Arrestees are not selected for the survey on a random or probability basis. Rather, adult male arrestees are selected at thediscretion of site personnel, who are guided by a target sample size and crime charge priority system. To obtain samples ofadult male arrestees with a sufficient distribution of serious arrest charges, ADAM interviewers, where possible, place apriority on felony arrestees and those arrested for offenses other than the sale or possession of drugs. Analyses have shownthat those arrested for drug offenses are more likely than other arrestees to be using drugs; as a result, ADAM statistics arelikely minimum estimates of drug use among the population of those adults arrested for serious offenses. With the exceptionof Omaha, males charged with driving offenses generally are excluded from the sample due to ADAM's emphasis on moreserious crimes. (In Omaha, all male arrestees brought to the booking facilities are included in the ADAM sample to obtain asample of sufficient size.) Because they are fewer in number, all adult female arrestees and all juvenile male and femalearrestees/detainees brought to the booking center during the data collection period are included in the ADAM sample,regardless of charge.

In nine sites, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Omaha, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Washington, DC, thecatchment area is the entire city. In Cleveland, Dallas, Ft. Lauderdale, Indianapolis, Manhattan, Miami, New Orleans,Phoenix, Portland, San Antonio, and San Jose, the catchment area is the entire county or parish. The catchment area for LosAngeles includes part of the city and part of the county, and in Birmingham and San Diego the catchment area includes theentire city and part of the county.

Twelve of the ADAM sites collect data from male juvenile arrestees/detainees. Eight of these sites also collect data onfemale arrestees/detainees; however given the small sample size across a majority of the ADAM female juvenile facilities,these data are not presented. For juveniles in each of the sites, excluding Washington, DC and St. Louis, the catchment areaencompasses the county. In Washington, DC and St. Louis, only juveniles arrested and detained in the city are included. InLos Angeles, the catchment area comprises parts of the city and county.

All urine specimens are sent to a central laboratory for analysis. The specimens are analyzed for 10 drugs: cocaine, opiates,marijuana, phencyclidine (PCP), methadone, benzodiazepines, methaqualone, propoxyphene, barbiturates, andamphetamines. All positive results for amphetamines are confirmed by gas chromatography to eliminate positives that maybe caused by over-the-counter drugs. For most drugs, the urine test can detect use in the previous 2 to 3 days. Exceptions aremarijuana and PCP, which sometimes can be detected several weeks after use.

Beginning in 1996, the program adopted marijuana testing cutoff levels in accordance with new U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration guidelines. The new cutoff level, 50ng/ml, is lower than the previous cutoff level thus more individuals using marijuana are identified. Analysis of trends at bothcutoff levels revealed that overall there is a 5 to 7 percentage point increase in positive results at the new level. Cautionshould be used in comparing marijuana percentages for 1996 and 1997 with results from previous years.

*